( Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1992) Google Scholar Wood, Neal, The Politics of Locke's Philosophy: A Social Study of “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding” ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983) Google Scholar and John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984) Google Scholar. 1 ( 1972): 3– 22 CrossRef Google Scholar Appleby, Joyce O., Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth Century England ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978) Google Scholar and Liberalism and Republicanism in Historical Imagination ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992) Google Scholar Vaughn, Karen I., John Locke, Economist and Social Scientist ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980) CrossRef Google Scholar and “The Economic Background to Locke's Two Treatises of Government,” in John Locke's “Two Treatises of Government”: New Interpretations, ed. J., “ The Making of Homo Faber: John Locke between Ideology and History,” Journal of the History of Ideas 33, no. 4 ( 1951): 550–66 CrossRef Google Scholar, and The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962) Google Scholar Hundert, E.
B., “ Locke on Capitalist Appropriation,” Western Political Quarterly 4, no.
For the socioeconomic perspective on Locke, see Macpherson, C. Despite their divergences on method and philosophical orientation, the two interpretations concur on the decisively modern, liberal, and bourgeois character of Locke's thought. However, the construal of Locke as a distinctively bourgeois thinker finds an earlier articulation in the esoteric-hermeneutic mode of reading pioneered by Leo Strauss in his Natural Right and History, which reconstructs from Locke's writings a modern, robust, and singularly liberal philosophical edifice of natural rights. Macpherson in The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. 1 This interpretation flows from the sociological-economic perspective on Locke opened up by C.
0 kommentar(er)
